A land bridge at conservative leverage
Expect a materially lower loan to value than on a built property. The lender is pricing planning risk as well as property risk.
Working to a deadline? Auction completions and chain breaks are what this desk does. Call and we will tell you today whether it is achievable.
020 4525 4876Land without planning consent is generally funded with a bridge at a low loan to value, not with a development facility. Once consent is granted, the site is refinanced onto a development loan that funds the build.
An illustrative situation, not a client case study. It describes the kind of enquiry this market sees. Any figures are examples, not a quotation, and no credit check or lender decision is involved in reading this.
Sites are usually sold on a timetable that does not respect the planning system. A vendor with a willing buyer rarely waits eight months for a committee date, and sites bought subject to planning trade at a premium precisely because the risk sits with the seller.
Buying unconditionally and taking the planning risk yourself is how most value is created in development — but it needs funding that will lend against land in its current state.
Expect a materially lower loan to value than on a built property. The lender is pricing planning risk as well as property risk.
A positive pre-application response, a planning consultant’s opinion, or nearby approvals for similar schemes all reduce the perceived risk and improve terms.
Once consent is granted, the site’s value usually rises sharply. The development facility refinances the bridge and funds the build, often releasing some of the uplift.
| Loan to value on unconsented land | Typically well below what a built property attracts |
| Loan to value on consented land | Often 60% to 70% of site value |
| Term on a land bridge | Set against the realistic planning timetable, with headroom |
| Exit | Development facility on grant of consent, or sale of the consented site |
Planning timescales are outside everyone’s control, so the term needs genuine headroom. A refusal and an appeal can add many months. These are examples to show the shape of a deal, not a quotation. Work out your own figures in the bridging calculator.
Generally no. Development lenders fund construction against a consented scheme. Before consent, the route is a bridge secured on the land at a conservative loan to value.
Considerably less than against a built property, because the lender is pricing planning risk as well. The exact figure depends on the site, the planning prospects and the evidence supporting them.
The facility still has to be repaid on its redemption date. That is why the exit needs to work even in the refusal case — usually a sale of the site, and usually at a lower figure.
Every case is different. A specialist will confirm what actually fits yours.
You have the site and the planning, but no completed schemes to point at.
Read the scenarioAn empty office, shop or light industrial unit that would be worth considerably more as flats.
Read the scenarioThe real dividing line between a bridge and a development facility, how each is drawn down and priced, and which one your scheme needs.
Read the guideSale, refinance or something else: how lenders underwrite your exit, what evidence they want, and what happens if the exit slips.
Read the guideEighteen situations across bridging, development, commercial and buy-to-let.
Browse them allAmram Finance Ltd is a credit broker, not a lender. We do not lend our own money and we do not approve or issue loan offers.
Your property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on a loan secured on it. Some forms of bridging finance and buy-to-let lending are not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.